Monday, 29 July 2013

Feminism? Now just a word for Sexism against men

Before i start, if your going to be one of these who are offended by free speech or think everything a man says is sexist. bugger off now because this article is about you not for you.

One thing i do respect is equal rights. and i mean rights that are equal but lately the balance of power is tilting over to the other side. worst thing is then the balance is tilted in this direction its harder for it to swing back because of fear. well fuck fear. im going to say what is on my mind in this post.

It is no secret that in history that women have been oppressed. in what has been a Male dominated society. and a group of ladies fought hard even risked going to prison for to change that women could have equal pay could have the basic democratic right to vote and other rights that us men take for granted, and well again I respect the fact that fought for their basic rights. and regarded as equals.

However what i do not respect is the new wave of Feminists who are trying (and unfortunately winning) to shift the balance of power toward them. the normal typical bunch are ugly hippy types who prob have less chance of getting laid then I do. who are squabbling over stupid shit like "Lads Mags" and who is on a back of a tenner. lets have a look at it from a man's point of view here.

They are trying to ban so called "Lads Mags" from being displayed on shop shaved because they think it is sexist. that they objectify women. well ok lets have a look a cover of one.

chanelle nuts magazine

Well ok she is posing in a sexual way but how is that any different from when men do it on Women’s Magazines. on the Lateist Chocolate advert with the male strippers or the "Iconic" diet coke advert.

This one of david Beckham for example he is wearing less then Chanelle is on the cover mag yet that is alowed to be on posters in the street and in Magazines. isnt that sexist towards men?

The Latest bullshit that feminists have pulled that there is "not enough women on banknotes"  that is a definite WTF moment. i mean is it the end of the world that the £10 £20 and £50 have people from history that just happen to be male. The £5 has a woman on it. in fact EVERY bank note has a woman on it. and just in case Caroline Criado-Perez is blind here is a picture of it now with a nice red arrow just in case she missed it.

Why are these stupid woman fighting over crap like this when there is worst oppression out there in the world. and all they are worried about is Lads Mags and who is on a back of a Tenner, if the women on this mags and Page 3 of The Sun (and Daily Star) where forced to posed and not of their free will and consent then  that would be a different matter altogether. but that’s the point the women who pose on front of magazines and in the Sun do so of their own free will. exercising THEIR rights as women to pose. For fuck sake you even seen women on a friday night they wear next to nothing (even in winter if in Reading) why are you not trying to cover them up? or when women where bikinis on the beach is that being oppressive to women? Or is it the case in some countries Women are being stoned for not covering up, are being raped by their husbands and Women are still being put in prison because THEY was raped!! The women’s right movement should focus their energy on helping those poor women in need who have less rights then we did in the 19th and early 20th Century . NOT moaning about who is on our money, NOT moaning about some beautiful young girl posing on magazines.

Then again most of them have their head up their arse and are blind to this. and some are trying to get (media) attention. they dont really care about women having equal rights they just have delusions of power.

But lets see how far women have got in the last 100yrs.
+ They are allowed to vote
+ They have a right to equal pay
+ We have had women in power granted the 2 examples i can think of fucked the Railway System in the UK
+ They have the right to equal employment
+ They are allowed to attend university. was a time that in Cambridge, women where not allowed to obtain a degree.

But on the flip coin lets see how men are fucked over
- Have to work 5yrs more then women until retirement
- Have less rights to see their own kids
- If they do things that are regarded as "womens work" they are branded sissies
- Same with clothing if i woman wears a pair of jeans its fine, if a man wears a dress he is branded a crossdresser or a trannie.
- Pretty much anything that is seemed "girlie" men get ripped on for doing yet women dont when they are doing "male orientated stuff"

The balance needs to be restored so it is equal not one side having the power male or female.  to be honest its not just sexism. the White Straight Male is prob the most discriminated by stealth group in the United Kingdom 

Monday, 22 July 2013

My Letter to Godaddy via the BBB over the Scam website

What you going to see is typical of GoDaddys "Copy&Paste" response to complaints and how i broke it down to show how much bullshit they talk.

Better Business Bureau:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID 9615107, and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
This is a typical "copy and paste" response from GoDaddy in and what half my complaint is about. again they dont address me by Name but use the generic " Dispute Resolution Consultant," not "Dear Mr Fisher." Again I want to stress this is typical of GoDaddy in handling complaints they skim though find key words and it seems that they "copy and paste" from a list of resonances rather then taking the time to write a proper reply

Furthermore lets break down the reply which took them over a week to reply too. IMHO not showing that they care about the
service they provide.
"To begin with, the accusations of spam and abuse should first be addressed with the Registrants of the domain names in question.  The companies or individuals to whom the domain names are registered are directly responsible for their domain’s use or misuse.  The complainant can use any public WHOIS database, such as, to locate the contact information for these complaints."

For which i did. (see attached) but the reply i got from the GoDaddy Abuse Team was.
"After further review we have determined we are not the hosting provider for this
site. We have neither access to, nor jurisdiction over the content on this site.
To determine who the web hosting provider is, you can use a publicly-available
tool like This tool will give you
the resolving IP address which can then be compared to's
( IP allocation database. This will give you the relevant
information for the true hosting provider."
This is a lie because the whois said that “” “” “” are registered with Godaddy and their Sister company “Wild West Domains” even the NSLOOKUP on the latter 2 shown an IP Address that linked to GoDaddy.

How GoDaddy handles accusations of scam sites, etc.:
While’s hosting and domain registration agreements do not allow such conduct, GoDaddy does not suspend domains or hosting accounts based on statements that “website […] can be possibly be used to obtain money by deception.” Our Abuse teams are happy to investigate and will take action under certain circumstances. However, if the complainant has evidence of illegal activity, they should report it to the appropriate law enforcement agency for their investigation and action. routinely works with law enforcement and the court system and takes action against sites when properly directed to do so.”

How GoDaddy's Abuse Team really handle complaints is, ether try to Ignore hoping that the complainer will just “forget about it” or do a typical “Copy and Paste” email calming they dont “Own the domain name” with impersonal email responses as you can see from the above evidence.

Because suspending hosting accounts, domain names, etc. can be harmful to legitimate businesses, we will not take action based on accusations as we receive many such accusations from competing businesses, disgruntled employees, unhappy customers, and so forth. For almost all cases, there are better methods to resolve the complaints with a company other than having their website taken offline. Indeed, the Better Business Bureau is one such avenue; however, in these cases, the complaints should be directed against the offending company, not the service provider that gives service (e.g. domain registration, hosting, electricity, phone services, etc.) to the offending company.”

Thats the thing I have given then proof that they are NOT a legitimate company (see attached screenshot) if you put in “” into twitter it will block it outright, the blogging site Tumblr has blocked spam blogs relating to this site and blacklisted the cover url “” why would a legit company need to cover themselves like this, also why would a WHOIS be registered first in eastern Europe then change their details to say they are in Hong Kong and the only phone number on their site is a New York one, with no other contact details not even a mailing address. Does that sound like a legitimate company to you because it doesn’t to me.

Finally, a Registrar and hosting company is different from a social media outlet. To say that GoDaddy should suspend a domain name because Tumblr, Twitter, or other service provider has purportedly blocked them from using their service is unreasonable.”

True However, Social Media is a branch of commutation like email which is a victim of spam. It is the Register / Hosting company's responsibility to make sure that what they are providing is not being use for Spam or anything that is illegal, Furthermore Buying/Selling Twitter Followers is against Twitter terms of service, so therefore to set up a website or company to make money by this means is not only unethical it is fraud.

In light of the above, GoDaddy appreciates and agrees with the complainant’s desire to rid the Internet of spam, fraud, and other such unlawful practices. However, it appears that the complainant simply does not agree with our cautious approach.”

No I just dont agree with your Lazy and unprofessional attitude. The fact you are dragging your heals over the situation and worry it will harm future sales if you get rid of this website because in the past you have deleted websites that have not been spam and other people have been complaining about it.

We ask that the complainant report any spam or other abuse regarding domains registered and/or hosted with and via the link provides above. If the complainant has evidence of illegal activity such as fraud, then they should report it to law enforcement or seek legal guidance on how to proceed. If the complainant would like to discuss this matter with our office, we are typically available Monday through Friday between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. MST (AZ) at +1 (480) 505-8828. If they would like a call during non-business hours, we are happy to oblige them. They may email to schedule.”

If you notice I am *NON-US* (hint: it says United Kingdom in the address) so phoning you would be a major expense and the time difference would mean my office hours would differ. We do have an “Action Fraud” team in the UK as well as Trading Standards which is similar to the BBB however, as the Domain(s) in question are registered with a US Company it would be difficult to complain to those bodies as I am sure it would be out of their jurisdiction. Hence why I have complained about the website itself to the BBB's scam website dept as well as here.

I feel this has not been resolved and GoDaddy are trying to fob me off or just dragging their heals and think I will just give up, its not going to be the case.

Stewart Fisher

This is why spam is such a problem because idiot website providers like them do fuck all to help. so if you get any twitter spam from write to GoDaddy if they get enough complaints they might get off their lazy arsholes about it.

Monday, 17 June 2013

An Open letter to Gocrappy.. err i mean GoDaddy

Dear GoDaddy

why are you so fucking useless with removing spam websites that are registered to you, why do you let spam/scam websites run for years despite evidence they are being used for fraud?

i have reported many websites that are registered under you (via WHOIS) yet you seem to fob me off with bullshit like "it doesn't belong to us" if that is the case why does the WHOIS report say it is. if that is forged shouldn't it be your duty to find out who it really belongs to and help close it down.

Lately i have been getting spam on Twitter and it is sneaky spam that leads to a fraud website which i have warned other people about in a past post i have reported the rouge users to Twitter and even them (slowly) suspend the users but that is not the root of the problem. the website that is registered with you GODADDY is. you have a spam policy on your website which IMHO is the biggist pile of crap between the protect and survive leaflet and the pages in the highway code that relate to cyclists.

Now you have a chance to prove me wrong and actually show you can be a responsible web provider, or you can be the bunch of lazy arseholes who dont give a flying fuck as long as you got your money and CLOSE THESE SITES DOWN including and dont give me bullshit about "oh report it to our abuse team" because that's just a fob off what is stopping your guy who in-between playing with himself bothers to reply to the twitter posts to actually forward the abuse complaints on?

you want your evidence well come on why do these sites need to mask their urls or the way they promote their sites if they are not geninue sites. my website is genuine and i have no problem posting it on twitter without the need to hide behind blogs tiny urls and multipliable forwarding domains in a shitty way to cover my tracks. if you have the means to track the incoming traffic to the site you will see it doesnt come from direct links it comes from a load of web forwarding.

I will not rest until you get your act together and I will let people know on the net what a irresponsible company you really are. and one day it will come back to bite you on your arse because it will come a point that no one genuine will ever want to do business with a company that is not to be seen to tackle the scourge of the internet which is spammers and scammers 

in closing i will say. "GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER!!"

Sunday, 26 May 2013

advice on the latist twitter spam tactic (aka favourite spamming / spam)

Lately there is been a spam tactic with the scum on twitter to randomly "favourite" tweets when you look on your profile their blurb has a tinyurl or another shortened url link